For England, who huffed and puffed but eventually came up against a half-decent team, couldn't score, suffered from a moment of indiscipline and then bounced out on that old penalty "lottery". Damn these lotteries. How come we always lose and the Germans always win ? It must be rigged. Either that or it isn't a lottery at all, it's a test of nerve and technique that our players repeatedly fail.
Hats off to Sven for at least refusing to blame anyone else, but as I said right at the start it was crazy to only bring four strikers, of whom two were injured, one was completely untried and the other was Peter Crouch. Fair enough, Hargreaves came in and did well, I'll hold my hands up to that, but the mystifying choice of Jenas ahead of another attacking option was a severe handicap.
Perhaps more on England later, including my general thoughts that goalscoring midfielders flatter to deceive and, Lampard being the prime example in this campaign, are often shown up for their lack of craft when they're not troubling the onion bag. A genuine international midfielder who also scores goals, like Bryan Robson, is worth his weight in gold. A flashy goalscorer who can't tackle and doesn't know how to dictate the tempo of a game, however ... and as for playing two of them in the same side ...
Meanwhile, keen as I am to skim over this, the team I backed to win it have been eliminated by the team I rubbished more than any other pre-tournament. I hope no one had any actual money on these tips :-). Fair play to France too, I didn't give them a cat in hell's chance of beating Spain and Brazil but they've done it. Germany, Italy, Portugal and France. Would you call any of them more than decent ? You can't point to anyone better who's been knocked out - Argentina maybe, but that 6-0 everyone was creaming about was against a team who didn't make a tackle for 90 minutes. With three games to go, I think if we don't see at least one classic and preferably two, this World Cup will not live long in the memory, myself.
